Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment - Childcare Provider Form ( BITSEA - CHILDCARE PROVIDER FORM )
Overview
Acronym:
BITSEA-CHILDCARE
Citation:
Carter, A.S., & Briggs-Gowan, M. (2005). ITSEA BITSEA: The Infant-Toddler and Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment. PsychCorp: San Antonio, TX.
Obtain(Email/Website):
Margaret.Briggs-Gowan@yale.edu / Alice.Carter@umb.edu / www.harcourtassessment.com
Cost:
Cost Involved
Copyrighted:
Yes
Measure Description:
The BITSEA is a brief screener of children's social or emotional behavior problems and competencies based on the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA). As with the ITSEA, it was designed to identify children with deficits or delays in these areas, with positive screens to be followed by administration of the full ITSEA. The measure yields a Problem Total Score and a Competence Total Score. There are two versions, a Parent Form and a Childcare Provider Form, both are reviewed in this database.
Domain(s) Assessed :
Externalizing Symptoms
Language(s) :
English
Chinese
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Italian
Russian
Spanish
Thai
Age Range:
1-3
Measure Type:
Screening
Measure Format:
Questionnaire
Average Time to Complete (min):
6
Reporter Type:
Parent/Caregiver
Average Time to Score (min):
5
Response Format:
3-point scale: 0=Not true/rarely, 1=Somewhat true/sometimes, and 2=Very true/often. A No Opportunity code allows raters to indicate they have not had the opportunity to observe the behavior.
Materials Needed:
Paper/Pencil
Information Provided:
Areas of Concern/Risks
Continuous Assessment
Raw Scores
Strengths
Training
Administration Training:
< 4 Hours Training by Experienced Clinician
Psychometrics
Notes on Psychometric Norms:
There are no norms, but the manual provides means and standard deviations by gender and age (12-17 months, 18-36 months).
If Yes, Specify Cutoffs:
PROBLEM SCORES: Cut scores=>75 percentile COMPETENCE SCORES: Cut scores=<15%
Criterion Validity:
| Not Known | Not Found | Nonclinical Samples | Clinical Samples | Diverse Samples | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Validity: | |||||
| Postdictive Validity: |
Pros & Cons/References
Pros:
1. The items appear clear and easy to understand.
2. The measure was developed specifically to assess infants and toddlers, and includes items that are developmentally sensitive and relevant to young children.
3. Assesses competencies as well as problem behaviors.
4. The measure appears to be a good screener in that scores are highly correlated with both the full ITSEA and the CBCL.
5. The measure is brief and can be administered in 6 minutes. 6. There is a Parent Provider version with identical items and scales to allow for comparisons between reporters.
Cons:
1. The full psychometrics of the Childcare Provider Form have not been examined. At this point (8/05) there are only data regarding internal consistency, and there are no norms.
2. The measure consists of 42 items, but it yields scores on only two scales. This limits the utility of this measure. The authors suggest that positive screens on the BITSEA be followed by the ITSEA. For childcare providers this does not seem feasible.
3. The age range of the measure (1-3) is awkward for treatment-outcome research and longitudinal studies because children need to fall in that age range at pre-, post-, and follow-up assessment periods.
4. With regard to using the measure for trauma-exposed children, there is no scale that directly measures trauma symptoms, so another measure would need to be used to capture trauma symptomatology.
5. The price of the measure seems high, given that its full psychometrics have not yet been examined, and there are no norms.
Editor of Review:
Chandra Ghosh Ippen, Ph.D.
Last Updated:
Fri, 08/05/2005
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Stay Connected
